Thursday, April 29, 2010

Όπως στα βυζαντινά ποικίλματα

Βυζαντινά μεταξωτά, μεταξωτά όλο νερά...
Όπως στα βυζαντινά ποικίλματα,
όπως σε κάτι εγκώμια, κάτι ύμνους με άγχος για το μέτρο, όπου προστίθενταν επίθετα σα χάντρες από αλαφρόπετρα, σκάψαμε τη γλώσσα με τη δεξιότητα του τυμβωρύχου. Όπως παρατάσσονταν οι τίτλοι σαν τους πήλινους στρατιώτες στο ξόδι του Qin Shi Huang.
Με λόγια φτάσαμε στη σιωπή. Από την πολλήν θεοληψία ξεμπαρκάραμε στην εντελή απιστία. Το σκεφτόμουν σήμερα ενόσω ετοίμαζα υλικό για θεματική ενότητα σχετικά με τις προβαλλόμενες κοινωνικές αξίες στον τομέα της εργασίας. Έπεσα σε κείμενο του Ν. Ξυδάκη σχετικά με το χρηματιστήριο τότε, σε καλοκαιρινή δημοσίευση του ευδαίμονος 1999. Περιγράφονται τα ίδια φαινόμενα (φενάκη, οικονομία αβάσιμη, κερδοσκοπία, τυχοδιωκτισμός, κατάρρευση) που τώρα προκαλούν τόση ψυχική αναστάτωση και αθυμία στους πολίτες. Όλα αυτά ως υλικό διδασκαλίας υπήρχαν και χρησιμοποιούνταν και στολίζουν τις θυμόσοφες εκθέσεις των εφήβων μας στο τμήμα της παραγωγής γραπτού λόγου. Όμως οι λέξεις στέκονται κούφιες, με όλην τους την αλήθεια.
Πώς να αναπτύξεις την τέχνη της ρητορικής, ως τρόπου σκέψης και τοποθέτησης, όταν οι πάντες κλείνουν το μάτι και λένε "τα ξέρεις, αυτά είναι όλα προσχήματα, θα τα πούμε στο διάλειμμα με πιπεράτες λεπτομέρειες"; Και πώς να επιμείνεις να την εκλεπτύνεις την τέχνη, μέχρι που από κάτω να φανεί η λάμψη της σκέψης, ένα αχνό κι ευγενικό σέλας, όταν το μόνο που κρατάς είναι οι πανηγυρικοί και, ιδίως, οι εμβληματικές νεκρολογίες;

Labels: ,

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Swedish again (with some Norwegian accent)

One recalls clearly how the world got ecstatic watching the presidential campaigns of the candidates in the U.S. The global public opinion invested interest and hope concerning the internal political processes of a foreign state. What could show more precisely the success of the superpower hegemony of the United States? No matter what, in many parts of the world people were looking up at Obama as if he was to be elected for the presidency in their own country. Intellectuals and analysts were trying to decide about the dynamics and potentials of his role, militants were doubting him and his declarations. And, once he was elected, there was a wave of global relief and enthusiasm. Indeed, active, outspoken, personal and direct, he has been entitled to some special attention, even more so if he is to be compared with the failure of the previous president to become anything close to the positive icon of a leader. I see the qualities of an inspired orator in him. He has achieved a high level of inspiring speech, beyond the stereotypical phrases of early 2000s. And I have to say that I agree with major parts of his approach to economy and social policy. In terms of delivered policy though, we still see the situation in Afghanistan, the recent unpleasant developments in Pakistan, the crudity of the Israeli stance in the Middle East peace process- if any-, the open wound of Iraq, the confused steps about the detainees of Guantanamo, etc. One, at this point, whispers the classical demand while evaluating the success of a worthy citizen "Λόγω μεν, έργω δε" (Oration on the one side, practical realizations on the other). And one comprehends that president Obama, who is not newly elected anymore, has quite a way to go.
I was surprised by the decision of the Norwegian Nobel Prize committee to grant its Peace Prize to Pres. Obama. It claimed that he won it due to "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples," citing his fledgling push for nuclear disarmament and his outreach to the Muslim world. It was all about hope and promise. But, let me say, it is like awarding a third year university student with the Nobel for Physics, because he is bright and hardworking and he promises to achieve much and extraordinary at some point.

Labels: ,

Monday, March 19, 2007

the capital Y

Oh Youth, oh people who deserve its capital Y.
Today I thought of this passage of Aristotle (Rhetoric, 1389a-b) for a good reason.
A reason that made me feel proud for having been around. The term "man" here indicates the human being. And it normally belongs to women, mostly, from what I have seen and understood.
And I searched quite a lot to find it.
Here is Lee Honeycutt's translation.

"...Let us now consider the various types of human character, in relation to the emotions and moral qualities, showing how they correspond to our various ages and fortunes. By emotions I mean anger, desire, and the like; these we have discussed already. By moral qualities I mean virtues and vices; these also have been discussed already, as well as the various things that various types of men tend to will and to do. By ages I mean youth, the prime of life, and old age. [1389a] By fortune I mean birth, wealth, power, and their opposites -- in fact, good fortune and ill fortune.
To begin with the Youthful type of character. Young men have strong passions, and tend to gratify them indiscriminately. Of the bodily desires, it is the sexual by which they are most swayed and in which they show absence of self-control. They are changeable and fickle in their desires, which are violent while they last, but quickly over: their impulses are keen but not deep-rooted, and are like sick people's attacks of hunger and thirst. They are hot-tempered, and quick-tempered, and apt to give way to their anger; bad temper often gets the better of them, for owing to their love of honour they cannot bear being slighted, and are indignant if they imagine themselves unfairly treated. While they love honour, they love victory still more; for youth is eager for superiority over others, and victory is one form of this. They love both more than they love money, which indeed they love very little, not having yet learnt what it means to be without it -- this is the point of Pittacus' remark about Amphiaraus. They look at the good side rather than the bad, not having yet witnessed many instances of wickedness. They trust others readily, because they have not yet often been cheated. They are sanguine; nature warms their blood as though with excess of wine; and besides that, they have as yet met with few disappointments. Their lives are mainly spent not in memory but in expectation; for expectation refers to the future, memory to the past, and youth has a long future before it and a short past behind it: on the first day of one's life one has nothing at all to remember, and can only look forward. They are easily cheated, owing to the sanguine disposition just mentioned. Their hot tempers and hopeful dispositions make them more courageous than older men are; the hot temper prevents fear, and the hopeful disposition creates confidence; we cannot feel fear so long as we are feeling angry, and any expectation of good makes us confident. They are shy, accepting the rules of society in which they have been trained, and not yet believing in any other standard of honour. They have exalted notions, because they have not yet been humbled by life or learnt its necessary limitations; moreover, their hopeful disposition makes them think themselves equal to great things -- and that means having exalted notions. They would always rather do noble deeds than useful ones: their lives are regulated more by moral feeling than by reasoning; and whereas reasoning leads us to choose what is useful, moral goodness leads us to choose what is noble. They are fonder of their friends, intimates, and companions than older men are, [1389b] because they like spending their days in the company of others, and have not yet come to value either their friends or anything else by their usefulness to themselves. All their mistakes are in the direction of doing things excessively and vehemently. They disobey Chilon's precept by overdoing everything, they love too much and hate too much, and the same thing with everything else. They think they know everything, and are always quite sure about it; this, in fact, is why they overdo everything. If they do wrong to others, it is because they mean to insult them, not to do them actual harm. They are ready to pity others, because they think every one an honest man, or anyhow better than he is: they judge their neighbour by their own harmless natures, and so cannot think he deserves to be treated in that way. They are fond of fun and therefore witty, wit being well-bred insolence."

Labels: , , ,